Press Jeffrey D. The RQI evaluation of the reviews from the first and final manuscripts by 2 independent reviewers are pending. Here is one of the two reviews at PNAS. Under Review 2016-09-26 Under Editor Review 2016-09-26 Under Editoal Board Review 20. 14,822,051 ORCID iDs and counting. Protein kinases mediate signal transduction and regulate fundamental cellular processes in eukaryotic cells. Brant Joseph F. PNAS投稿,Under Editor Review 5天_论文发表 @3楼:5天再等等吧 如果1周左右还是不送审就悬了嗯嗯,谢谢,我也是这么觉得。 希望快点出结果。. Board, guest editors determine suitability of your work for PNAS. 94 cm high. 由Under review变成With Editoal Office，有谁知道这是什么原因嘛？. However, note the use of the word ‘recommendation. airbnb mildura. Peer Reviewer Instructions. The Editor-in-Chief also noted, “I read the paper myself and with some reluctance sided with referee #2. The molecular and cellular mechanisms that underlie the self-sacrificing nest repair with the use of body fluid for the insect society is of great interest, which prompted us to investigate the biochemistry, physiology, cell and molecular biology, and developmental and evolutionary aspects of the gall-repairing body fluid produced by soldier. Goodman Amy H. pnas-under-editorial-board-review-pending-final-recommendation-pdf 1/21 Downloaded from vendors. How species respond to ongoing climate change has been a hot research topic, especially with the controversy in shifting range (movement) or persisting in local habitat (in situ) as the primary response. Learn more about our 2020 article- and journal-level metrics. 去年2021年10月份，通过direct submission投了一篇。 Paper一审. 807 10. 至少你向前进了一步，希望我也能进下一轮。。。一起加油!【 引自上文: 】: 我也刚投PNAS, 状态从editorial board review 变editor review. Under Editor Review 2015-07-27. So, it would be difficult to accurately guess their decision. Most presentations go through Direct. ” [Referee #2 report] This paper is one of several that now looks at replication. Shatz has greatly advanced our understanding of how the pattern of precise and orderly connections in the mammalian central nervous system is achieved during development. The submission systems of some journals use the status "under review" even when the manuscript is under the initial editorial assessment. Sep 27, 2016 · MANUSCRIPT REVIEW PROCESS Each paper is assigned to a member of the PNAS Editorial Board from one of the 31 branches or disciplines defined by the journal. , Image credit:. Authors and reviewers must notify PNAS if a manuscript reports potential dual use research of concern. As of 15 March 2015, I'm taking a 3 year stint on the editorial board of PNAS. PNAS 咋这么慢 ？ PNAS在editor手里一个多星期了，是不是没戏了？ PNAS有戏吗？ PNAS 的paper under review了，说明什么？ PNAS under review 不到一周就Pending Final Recommendation PNAS "under editorial board review" 要多久？. During the review process the authors are blinded to the identities of both the editor and the referees. Boyd Michael Branson Alex M. For a glossy journal like PNAS, you can expect that at least one referee will be from a potentially opposing camp, because for this kind of journal, the editor really needs to see that point of view as well. Multiple rounds of review and revision are strongly discouraged. The Overleaf PNAS template will be loaded, and additional guidelines for preparing your submission are included within the template itself. 904 16. Ovulin is normally a 264-aa polypeptide that's stated in the male accessory gland, alongside 70C100 various other accessory gland. 807 10. Publications. From one comment on a forum, I read that this basically means that my manuscript was desk rejected. Rapid, high-quality peer review PNAS is edited by members of the NAS, a private, nonprofit society of distinguished scholars. PNAS投稿,Under Editor Review 5天_论文发表 @3楼:5天再等等吧 如果1周左右还是不送审就悬了嗯嗯,谢谢,我也是这么觉得。 希望快点出结果。. ) Therefore, pick your poison. The review appeared to be from outside the field too, suggesting the editor was so lost that they couldn't identify an appropriate reviewer. For in-depth review, at least two outside referees. Statistical and Methodological Review Committee Adrian Raftery (Chair) Alicia L. The similar RNA editing-dependent feedback regulation restricted the other ciliary kinases NEKL-4/NEK10 and DYF-18/CCRK, which suggests a widespread mechanism that underlies kinase regulation. Submit an image that is 21. you mentioned), the journal seems to be Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), as the ‘Under Editor Review’ status is typical to PNAS. 交流中心 › 分类: 投稿 › 投稿PNAS，没到editor就pending了 0 赞 踩 iRobot 管理员提问于 7月 前 这种就是拒稿了吗？都不给editor看一眼的？ Stage Start Date Pending Recommendation 2021-05-20 Under Editorial Board Review 2021-05-19 Quality Control Review Completed 2021-05-19 Quality Control Revie []. Tier 3: Independent peer review Research papers across all submission routes are peer reviewed by at least two independent ex-perts. 779 2. Peer review (1) sort Sort. Bronack Ashley A. PNAS will grant Plan S authors waivers for the CC BY fee on a case-by-case basis, if they have no funds available. 1715374115; licensed under CC BY 4. (A) Plants generated from vegetative tissue cuttings from the potato (wt) and potRr lines #1 and #2 shown in Figure 1C were propagated in chambers under eCO 2 [air + 1. Stop 2: PNAS and some alleged shark-jumping. Aims and scope. This paper was previously . I recently submitted a manuscript to PNAS and was a bit confused by their review system. Jan 28, 2023 · PNAS Acceptance Rate 44. However, we were able to secure a second round of reviews after a successful appeal to the editor. Manuscripts are reviewed with the explicit understanding that all authors have seen and approved of the submitted version. Learn more about our 2020 article- and journal-level metrics. Nobel Prize winner Mario Molina. So, it would be difficult to accurately guess their decision. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences has unusual submission procedures. About the PNAS Member Editor. 4 % Write a review See all reviews The definition of journal acceptance rate is the percentage of all articles submitted to PNAS that was accepted for publication. PNAS Information for Authors REVISED December 2022 256 0. The scientists, who sent a signed letter to the journal PNAS on Thursday, say that the paper is based on false statements and flawed statistical analysis and could encourage people to put themselves at risk by congregating in groups, believing that wearing a mask is enough to protect them from infection. Once the peer review is complete, the Member Editor goes through the comments for their evaluation (probably indicated by 'Under Editor Review') . DOI: 10. A magnifying glass. 791 11. Reviewers are contacted before being sent a paper and are asked to return comments within 1 to 2 weeks for most papers. Under Editor Review 2016-09-26 Under Editoal Board Review 20. About pending vs recommendation recommendation final pending Pnas (For example, for 1 x 10 4 cells per well, resuspend cells 1 x 10 4 per 80 μL = 1. 意为等待负责的编辑处理。 在编辑审稿前，助手负责审查稿件是否齐全，不齐全的话则立即要求作者按要求补充相关材料。 3. Collapse all. ‘Under Review’ means (in most cases) that it is undergoing peer review. PNAS Information for Authors REVISED July 2022 228 0. Decision made – notification imminent:. 1 4. ’ This is only a recommendation, and not a decision. However, we were able to secure a second round of reviews after a successful appeal to. 交流中心 › 分类: 投稿 › PNAS二审Pending Recommendation一个月了？ 0 赞 踩 iRobot 管理员提问于 2年 前 PNAS一审拒稿，根据审稿人意见补充实验后重投，二审结束了，然后pending recommendation一个月了，请问大牛这是什么情况？ 还要有多久才能有消息？ 问题标签：Pending Recommendation, PNAS, 投稿状态 2 回复 0 赞. I had one very bad experience and one very good one. The Overleaf PNAS template will be loaded, and. In the reviews, Reviewer 2 continued to be positive across the board, while Reviewer 4 raised a new set of concerns, most of which were not present in the previous review. 205 3. from editorial board -> editor -> peer review -> revision, etc. More than 40 scientists, including leading epidemiologists studying COVID-19, are calling on a top journal to retract a paper from a Nobel Prize–winning chemist that claimed that wearing face masks is the crucial factor in slowing the spread of the coronavirus — diminishing the role that social distancing. About the PNAS Member Editor. The review appeared to be from outside the field too, suggesting the editor was so lost that they couldn't identify an appropriate reviewer. The responsible member of the Editorial Board reviews the final version of the manuscript, along with all rounds of reviewers’ comments and the authors’ point-by-point responses. Then we tried PNAS. Breighner Andrea M. Once the peer review is complete, the Member Editor goes through the comments for their evaluation (probably indicated by ‘Under Editor Review’). If so, its evaluation process is slightly different. However, we were able to secure a second round of reviews after a successful appeal to. Reviewer 3 was less so but wrote essentially positive comments asking for some changes and clarifications. ‘Under Review’ means (in most cases) that it is undergoing peer review. 2 mar 2022. Scientists are elected by their peers to membership in the NAS for outstanding contributions to research. Board, guest editors determine suitability of your work for PNAS. Washington D. PNAS will grant Plan S authors waivers for the CC BY fee on a case-by-case basis, if they have no funds available. Therefore, it is very difficult to say something about Elsevier journals - they. Authors can then submit manuscripts to PNAS by using the PDF and source files generated by Overleaf. Here is one of the two reviews at PNAS. 807 10. Stage Start Date Under Review 2015-01-22 Under Editor Review 2015-01-21 Under Editorial Board Review 2015-01-12 Quality Control Review Completed 2015-01-12 Quality Control Review Started 2015-01-09 Author Approved Submission 2015-01-09 Waiting for Author Approval of Converted Files 2015-01-09 Waiting for File Conversion 2015-01-09 7 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !. More than 40 scientists, including leading epidemiologists studying COVID-19, are calling on a top journal to retract a paper from a Nobel Prize–winning chemist that claimed that wearing face masks is the crucial factor in slowing the spread of the coronavirus — diminishing the role that social distancing. The Editors engage regularly with researchers at conferences and institute visits. 但是，基于当前您的稿件处于“Under Editor Review”的状态，并且投稿的是一家顶级期刊（如您所述），对于像《美国国家科学院院刊》（PNAS）这类的期刊，“Under Editor Review”这类审核状态还是比较常见的。如果是这样的话，稿件审核的流程可能有些微的不同。. PNAS will grant Plan S authors waivers for the CC BY fee on a case-by-case basis, if they have no funds available. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (often abbreviated PNAS or PNAS USA) is a peer-reviewed multidisciplinary scientific journal. 3 2. The Editors engage regularly with researchers at conferences and institute visits. Not the fastest turnaround, and the coauthor permission forms required at the revision stage are cumbersome. Learn more about our 2020 article- and journal-level metrics. 19 ene 2016. It is known for its archi-29 tecture, music, sports clubs,. 21 abr 2005. 意为等待负责的编辑处理。 在编辑审稿前，助手负责审查稿件是否齐全，不齐全的话则立即要求作者按要求补充相关材料。 3. Open Access Review Measles Virus Host Invasion and Pathogenesis by Brigitta M. Pnas editorial process. Reviewers are contacted before being sent a paper and are asked to return comments within 1 to 2 weeks for most papers. As of 15 March 2015, I'm taking a 3 year stint on the editorial board of PNAS. The way I try to see it, is that things seem to be a lot better than they used to be when there were no online submission and tracking systems. MANUSCRIPT REVIEW PROCESS Each paper is assigned to a member of the PNAS Editorial Board from one of the 31 branches or disciplines defined by the journal. Yeah I only saw pending recommendation, never "final" before we got the acceptance email. 小木虫 - 学术 科研 互动社区. 问题标签： Pending Recommendation, PNAS. Bronack Ashley A. Many plant disease resistance (R) genes undergo AS, and several R genes require alternatively. Here is one of the two reviews at PNAS. Here, we address this by performing vigilance state-specific clustering analysis on 2-photon calcium imaging data from the sensorimotor cortex in combination with global electroencephalogram (EEG) microstate analysis derived from multi-EEG signals obtained over widespread cortical locations. 2 mar 2022. The “decision in process” status means that the editor is finally deciding on . PNAS Information for Authors REVISED December 2022 256 0. However, we were able to secure a second round of reviews after a successful appeal to. Aims and scope. 2 4. Gastrinreleasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is an attractive target for the cancer and itch therapy. 205 3. He has thereby played a leadership role. Here is one of the two reviews at PNAS. , Image credit:. 27 ago 2015. Legends should only include brief descriptions of the figures. The template allows authors to easily prepare and edit their Brief Report manuscripts using Overleaf. 交流中心 › 分类: 投稿 › PNAS二审，Under Editor Review之后Pending Recommendation已经快两周了 0 赞 踩 iRobot 管理员提问于 7月 前 一审意见一个大修一个小修，按理说直接甩给两个审. Pending Recommendation 2019-08-19 Under Editor Review 2019-08-19 Under Editorial Board Review 2019-08-14 Author Approved Submission 2019-08-14. Tier 3: Independent peer review Research papers across all submission routes are peer reviewed by at least two independent ex-perts. Jan 9, 2023 · In review, PNAS is a High Impact science journal that publishes 95% of peer-reviewed papers through Direct Submission and 5% are not and are contributed submissions. On Jul 31st we received our first round of reviews. About the PNAS Member Editor. Jul 24, 2011 · 投PNAS 36天了，还在under editor review - Biology版 - 未名存档 首页 未名存档 话题女王 小圈子 马甲追踪 版面排名 流量曲线 水枪排名 发帖量曲线 发帖版面饼图 发帖时间柱图 关于本站 帮助 boards 本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档，一周内的贴子最多显示50字，超过一周显示500字 访问原贴 Biology版 - 投PNAS 36天了，还在under editor review 相关话题的讨论汇总 话题: pnas 话题: under 话题: editor 话题: review 话题: 审稿 进入Biology版参与讨论 1 (共1页) 1 (共1页) 进入Biology版参与讨论 相关话题的讨论汇总. The neural oscillations in our working brains are rhythmic (Hutcheon & Yarom, 2000). PNAS二审，Under Editor Review之后Pending Recommendation已经快两周了，什么情况. Board, guest editors determine suitability of your work for PNAS. Multiple rounds of review and revision are strongly discouraged. High impact PNAS publishes some of the most highly cited research in the world. If your paper is sent out for review, your member editor or guest editor selects recognized subject experts to review your work. Pending Recommendation 2019-08-19 Under Editor Review 2019-08-19 Under Editorial Board Review 2019-08-14 Author Approved Submission 2019-08-14. preliminary manuscript information submitted 2021-02-07. 063 18. Dec 1, 2009 · The majority of papers published in PNAS are submitted directly to the journal and follow the standard peer review process. They'll probably inform you on Monday, best of. Dec 1, 2009 · The majority of papers published in PNAS are submitted directly to the journal and follow the standard peer review process. Mar 18, 2020 · Once the peer review is complete, the Member Editor goes through the comments for their evaluation (probably indicated by ‘Under Editor Review’). ‘Under Review’ means (in most cases) that it is undergoing peer review. Editor Acceptance Rate Review Berenbaum Acceptance Rate 0. Letters to the Editor provide brief comments that allow readers to constructively address a difference of opinion with authors of a PNAS article. The review appeared to be from outside the field too, suggesting the editor was so lost that they couldn't identify an appropriate reviewer. (Jan 12-March 20, 2018 = 67 days. The procedures of the National Academy of Sciences have unusual procedures of presentation. Converted Files Awaiting File Conversion 7 years ago # QUOTE 6 Jab 2 No Jab ! I have a job that's here to be reviewed. Gastrinreleasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is an attractive target for the cancer and itch therapy. Aizenberg is one of the pioneers of the rapidly advancing field of biomimetic materials chemistry. Yortsos, NAE Viterbi School of Engineering University of Southern California USA Deputy Editors Biological, Health, and Medical Sciences David A. As of 15 March 2015, I'm taking a 3 year stint on the editorial board of PNAS. However, we were able to secure a second round of reviews after a successful appeal to. Based on the Journal Acceptance Rate Feedback System database, the latest acceptance rate of PNAS Editor Donald Canfield is 100. How species respond to ongoing climate change has been a hot research topic, especially with the controversy in shifting range (movement) or persisting in local habitat (in situ) as the primary response. 779 2. Pending Recommendation 2019-08-19 Under Editor Review 2019-08-19 Under Editorial Board Review 2019-08-14 Author Approved Submission 2019-08-14. Include a brief lay-language caption (50–60 words) and credit information (e. A magnifying glass. The Assistant Managing Editor, Peer Review Systems oversees the management of the editorial systems involved in the peer review of PNAS and PNAS Nexus content under the direction of the Senior Managing Editor. Tier 3: Independent peer review Research papers across all submission routes are peer reviewed by at least two independent ex-perts. of the work for PNAS. Contact PNAS for instructions on submitting large files. Letters are limited to 500 words, 2 graphical elements (figures or tables), and 10 references. The speed of the review process depends very much on the combination of journal, (associate) editors and reviewers. PNAS encourages authors to preregister their studies and analysis plans and to provide links to the preregistration in their submission. It is the official journal of the National Academy of Sciences, published since 1915, and publishes original research, scientific reviews, commentaries, and letters. 14,822,051 ORCID iDs and counting. More than 40 scientists, including leading epidemiologists studying COVID-19, are calling on a top journal to retract a paper from a Nobel Prize–winning chemist that claimed that wearing face masks is the crucial factor in slowing the spread of the coronavirus — diminishing the role that social distancing. Pending Recommendation 2019-08-19 Under Editor Review 2019-08-19 Under Editorial Board Review 2019-08-14 Author Approved Submission 2019-08-14. About the PNAS Member Editor. So I normally decline invitations to serve as PE (or member-editor, which is another category) for PNAS (and as editor, associate editor, etc. Stop 2: PNAS and some alleged shark-jumping. Introduction Rhythms are central to life and pervasive in human behaviors. Brooks Katherine W. How species respond to ongoing climate change has been a hot research topic, especially with the controversy in shifting range (movement) or persisting in local habitat (in situ) as the primary response. don tamil movie watch online tamilrockers, persimmon marker find the markers
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. . Pnas under editor review
During the review process the authors are blinded to the identities of both the editor and the referees. 交流中心 › 分类: 投稿 › PNAS二审Pending Recommendation一个月了？ 0 赞 踩 iRobot 管理员提问于 2年 前 PNAS一审拒稿，根据审稿人意见补充实验后重投，二审结束了，然后pending recommendation一个月了，请问大牛这是什么情况？ 还要有多久才能有消息？ 问题标签：Pending Recommendation, PNAS, 投稿状态 2 回复 0 赞. Open Access Review Measles Virus Host Invasion and Pathogenesis by Brigitta M. Dec 1, 2009 · The majority of papers published in PNAS are submitted directly to the journal and follow the standard peer review process. Courier or express mail: PNAS, 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW, NAS 340, Washington, DC 20418 USA. Here is one of the two reviews at PNAS. Board, guest editors determine suitability of your work for PNAS. A magnifying glass. , 2018 ). Nearly 200 members of the NAS have won Nobel Prizes. Pending adjudication - means there is an open non-monetary issue to resolve While. Brief reports are 2,000-word articles that describe observations of immediate impact. A magnifying glass. On the fourth day, it went from "Under Editorial Board Review" to. Include a brief lay-language caption (50–60 words) and credit information (e. Under Review 2016-09-26 Under Editor Review 2016-09-26 Under Editoal Board Review 20. The Editor-in-Chief also noted, “I read the paper myself and with some reluctance sided with referee #2. It isn’t unethical for you to ask about its status, assuming you have allowed enough time to go by that you aren’t. 6 ene 2015. Aug 13, 2020 · A little slow for PNAS but cannot complain at all on speed). Stop 2: PNAS and some alleged shark-jumping. 2 mar 2022. The member editor manages the peer review process for papers in their . , Image credit:. Submit an image that is 21. He has used highly innovative techniques to advance the knowledge of ozone depletion, climate change, and atmospheric pollution. ’ This is only a recommendation, and not a decision. Choose a language:. High impact PNAS publishes some of the most highly cited research in the world. It is better to contact editor. Yeah I only saw pending recommendation, never "final" before we got the acceptance email. Brunetto Nicole Budzinski Pearl Buenvenida Tom D. Motivation: We are pleased with the peer review process with PNAS. Board, guest editors determine suitability of your work for PNAS. If the initial reviews are conflicting, the Action Editor may occasionally decide to approach an additional reviewer. Canfield W. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (often abbreviated PNAS or PNAS USA) is a peer-reviewed multidisciplinary scientific journal. 904 16. Aug 13, 2020 · Stop 2: PNAS and some alleged shark-jumping. 791 11. De Vries 1, Stephen McQuaid 2, W. During the review process the authors are blinded to the identities of both the editor and the referees. Pnas-under-editor-review-pending-recommendation Aug 09, 2021 · Pnas Pending Final Recommendation Under Review 4 Dec 2016 The status 'pending recommendation' means that. I had one very bad experience and one very good one. 但是，基于当前您的稿件处于“Under Editor Review”的状态，并且投稿的是一家顶级期刊（如您所述），对于像《美国国家科学院院刊》（PNAS）这类的期刊，“Under Editor Review”这类审核状态还是比较常见的。如果是这样的话，稿件审核的流程可能有些微的不同。. , Image credit:. Critical roles of DNA demethylation in the activation of ripening-induced genes and inhibition of ripening-repressed genes in tomato fruit. 1 Answer to this question. PNAS will grant Plan S authors waivers for the CC BY fee on a case-by-case basis, if they have no funds available. Then we tried PNAS. It is better to contact editor. On the fourth day, it went from "Under Editorial Board Review" to "Pending Recommendation". A magnifying glass. About the PNAS Member Editor. , for other journals). They actually spend a lot . However, we were able to secure a second round of reviews after a successful appeal. Phone 1-202-334-2679, fax 1-202-334-2739, e-mail pnas@nas. Submit an image that is 21. On average, a full review takes just 46 days, and most articles publish within 6 months of submis-sion. Under Editor Review 2019-08-05 Under Editorial Board Review 2019. Does this mean a rejection Not always. We present an inactive-state crystal structure of GRPR complexed with non-peptide antagonist PD176252 and two active-state cryo-EM structures of GRPR complexed with natural peptide agonist GRP and synthetic BBN analog [D-Phe 6, β-Ala 11, Phe 13, Nle 14] Bn (6–14). The handling editor and all reviewers are very positive and polite. When I asked for an extension of the deadline. Then we tried PNAS. 18 mar 2020. Online archive. William J. The RQI evaluation of the reviews from the first and final manuscripts by 2 independent reviewers are pending. Under Editor Review 2016-09-26 Under Editoal Board Review 20. We present an inactive-state crystal structure of GRPR complexed with non-peptide antagonist PD176252 and two active-state cryo-EM structures of GRPR complexed with natural peptide agonist GRP and synthetic BBN analog [D-Phe 6, β-Ala 11, Phe 13, Nle 14] Bn (6–14). Tier 3: Independent peer review Research papers across all submission routes are peer reviewed by at least two independent ex-perts. Brian Candice M. We look to reviewers to help PNAS ensure the following in a submitted paper: Research is well designed and executed. Yortsos has served on the PNAS Nexus Editorial Board as a deputy editor since May 2022 and as Interim Editor-in-Chief since September 2022. Contact PNAS for instructions on submitting large files. What was the decision finally? 4 years ago # bec6 QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad ! My paper is now under review. Introduction Rhythms are central to life and pervasive in human behaviors. Gastrinreleasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is an attractive target for the cancer and itch therapy. Getting straight to your query, the status means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it. Jul 24, 2011 · 投PNAS 36天了，还在under editor review - Biology版 - 未名存档 首页 未名存档 话题女王 小圈子 马甲追踪 版面排名 流量曲线 水枪排名 发帖量曲线 发帖版面饼图 发帖时间柱图 关于本站 帮助 boards 本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档，一周内的贴子最多显示50字，超过一周显示500字 访问原贴 Biology版 - 投PNAS 36天了，还在under editor review 相关话题的讨论汇总 话题: pnas 话题: under 话题: editor 话题: review 话题: 审稿 进入Biology版参与讨论 1 (共1页) 1 (共1页) 进入Biology版参与讨论 相关话题的讨论汇总. The Member Editor conveys their decision to the Editorial Board Member, who makes the final decision. Pnas-under-editor-review-pending-recommendation Aug 09, 2021 · Pnas Pending Final Recommendation Under Review 4 Dec 2016 The status 'pending recommendation' means that. The other thing I've noticed about successful work for PNAS is that the papers tell a. The review appeared to be from outside the field too, suggesting the editor was so lost that they couldn't identify an appropriate reviewer. Many well done ones by some of these very authors. 但是，基于当前您的稿件处于"Under Editor Review"的状态，并且投稿的是一家顶级期刊（如您所述），对于像《美国国家科学院院刊》（PNAS）这类的期刊，"Under Editor Review"这类审核状态还是比较常见的。如果是这样的话，稿件审核的流程可能有些微的不同。. Gastrinreleasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is an attractive target for the cancer and itch therapy. 904 16. If your paper is sent out for review, your member editor or guest editor selects recognized subject experts to review your work. PNAS是天底下最黑的杂志之一： 我们实验室有个千老，他之前postdoc的paper投PNAS,，结果前后不到一个月就接受了 ，而我的是过了一个月才送审。 本来我以为他的文章多牛逼，原来一看，他推荐的编委会成员和编辑就一人（同一人） ，他和我说，这个人是他老板的同事，所以2天就送审。 这个还不算，送审回来，一个明确说拒绝，一个说接受，结果编辑直接接受，只让做小 修。 真他妈的太黑了，这个杂志水太深！ ！ ！ f*****f 发帖数: 195 15 再加2个进度： Review Complete; E-Mail Notification Sent 2013-07-08 Pending Final Recommendation 2013-07-08. 交流中心 › 分类: 投稿 › PNAS二审，Under Editor Review之后Pending Recommendation已经快两周了 0 赞 踩 iRobot 管理员提问于 7月 前 一审意见一个大修一个小修，按理说直接甩给两个审稿人不就得了？这是找了第三个审稿人的意思么？ stage start date pending recommendation 2021-02-11 under editor review 2021-02-11 under editorial. If the initial reviews are conflicting, the Action Editor may occasionally decide to approach an additional reviewer. Goodman Amy H. . Jan 9, 2023 · In review, PNAS is a High Impact science journal that publishes 95% of peer-reviewed papers through Direct Submission and 5% are not and are contributed submissions. It could be that the editor only works on editorial decisions every couple weeks. "The paper exposes a compelling theory on a fundamental and challenging problem, and it provides important insights on many of the questions raised. mnratb86 2022-08-09 2269 次浏览 赞 653 最新回答. 4 3. . free new brazzers